Re: Call for vote (Re: call for seconds: on firmware)

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-vote@lists.debian.org, debian-project@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Call for vote (Re: call for seconds: on firmware)
From: Ean Schuessler <ean@brainfood.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:29:53 -0600 (CST)
Message-id: <26792701.18841229092193603.JavaMail.root@zimbra.xen.brainfood.com>
In-reply-to: <87fxkv7tww.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com>

Does 5 refer only to firmware that is not currently identified as being non-free? If that is the case, is 5 a viable choice? If it doesn't resolve the problem completely and allow us to release then it needs to be accompanied by a plan for the other problem firm/software.

----- "Manoj Srivastava" <srivasta@debian.org> wrote:

>         Here is the *DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT* ballot for the GR. Please note
>  the dates on the ballot; voting is not open yet.
> 
>         Please send comments to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org list.

-- 
Ean Schuessler, CTO Brainfood.com
ean@brainfood.com - http://www.brainfood.com - 214-720-0700 x 315

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Call for vote (Re: call for seconds: on firmware)
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Final call for votes: GR: Project membership procedures
Next by Date: Re: Final call for votes: GR: Project membership procedures
Previous by thread: Re: Call for vote (Re: call for seconds: on firmware)
Next by thread: Re: Proposed wording for the SC modification
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread