* Steve Langasek (vorlon@debian.org) [081201 01:15]: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 09:45:56AM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > > ,----[ Proposal 4: Allow release managers leeway to include non-dfsg bits as needed ] > > | Debian's priorities are our users and free software. We don't trade > > | them against each other. However during getting an release out of the > > | door, decisions need to be done how to get a rock stable release of the > > | high quality Debian is known for, release more or less on time, and to > > | minimize the usage of problematic software. We acknowledge that there > > | is more than just one minefield our core developers and the release > > | team are working at. > > | > > | We as Developers at large continue to trust our release team to follow > > | all these goals, and therefor encourage them to continue making > > | case-by-case-decisions as they consider fit, and if necessary > > | authorize these decisions. > > | > > | (Since this option overrides the SC, I believe it would require 3:1 > > | majority) > > `---- > > This (and the vote web page) is missing one of the spelling corrections from > <20081109151358.GM28730@mails.so.argh.org>: therefor -> therefore. > > I would also suggest the following changes; Andi, I'd appreciate if you > would acknowledge these under A.1.6 of the SRP: > > s/ during/, while/ > s/an release/a release/ > s/need to be done/need to be made about/ > s/rock stable/rock-stable/ > s/working at/working in/ > s/case-by-case-decisions/case-by-case decisions/ > s/authorize these decisions/we authorize these decisions/ As always, I trust your language skills more than mine. IOW, these changes are approved / acknowledged. Cheers, Andi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature