Le samedi 15 novembre 2008 à 09:45 -0600, Debian Project Secretary a écrit : > | (Since this option overrides the SC, I believe it would require 3:1 > | majority) So you get to decide which options need 3:1 majority? I don’t understand why you decide that we need a 3:1 majority to allow release managers to release lenny, while we do not require such a fuss to allow kernel or glibc developers to knowingly violate the social contract at each upload. Why should we consider the stable release process differently from our other processes? -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=