Hi! > | Option: Ask the DAM to postpone the changes > | > | The Debian Project, by way of a general resolution of its developers, asks > | the Debian Account Managers to postpone the implementation of the changes > | described on the debian-devel-announce mailing list (Message-id: > | <878wsgmi1j.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de>) about "Developer Status", until there > | is consensus on a proposal, or a vote to define the proposal that should > | be implemented. > > and: > > | Option: Ask the DAM to implement the changes > | > | The Debian Project, by way of a general resolution of its developers, asks > | the Debian Account Managers to start the implementation of the changes > | described on the debian-devel-announce mailing list (Message-id: > | <878wsgmi1j.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de>) about "Developer Status". I second these two options as alternatives to the option proposed by Peter Palfrader. Rationale: I like Peter's option, but I think that not having these other two makes the meaning of "Further Discussion" unclear. -- Besos, Marga
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature