On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:21:57AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > Hi, > > I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution, > so I am thinking of proposing this as an alternative option. > > The text I'm thinking about is currently this: > > | The Debian Project recognizes that many contributors to the project are > | not working withing established frameworks of Debian and thus are not > | provided by the project with as much help as might be possible, useful > | or required. > | . > | We thank Joerg Jaspert for exploring ideas on how to involve > | contributors more closely with the project so that they can get both > | recognition and the necessary tools to do their work. > | . > | We realize that the proposal posted to the debian-devel-announce > | mailinglist is not yet finalized and may not have the support of a large > | part of our community. We invite the DAM to further develop his ideas > | in close coordination with other members of the project, and to present > | a new and improved proposal on the project's mailinglists in the future, > | at least two weeks prior to any planned implementation. > > This is not a call for seconds yet, but a request for comments. > > So, any changes that should be made before it gets proposed, if it will? I like it, and would second it. -- Martin Zobel-Helas <zobel@debian.org> | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature