Re: Draft ballot for Proceedural Vote: Suspension of the changes of the Project's membership procedures.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:28:43PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> a1ea0fab-9ff7-4466-a951-99c712df8192
> [ ] Choice 1: Decision on membership reform stands until GR decided
> [ ] Choice 2: Decision on membership reform delayed until GR decided
> [ ] Choice 3: Further discussion
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does "Further discussion" mean in the context of this vote? I think
there should be no "Further discussion" on the ballot, as it is not clear
what would happen if "Further discussion" wins. Would the decision still
be suspended or not?
Gaudenz
--
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter.
Try again. Fail again. Fail better.
~ Samuel Beckett ~
Reply to: