Re: Ballot for leader2008
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 02:15:55 +0100, Anand Kumria <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
Top posting corrected, in order for people to actually follow
the chain of communication. Also added a level of quote marks.
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: <email@example.com>
>> Date: Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:02 AM
>> Subject: Ballot for leader2008
>> To: Anand Kumria <firstname.lastname@example.org>
The mail was processed an hour after the vote ended. Surprise,
mail is not a synchronous protocol.
>> No ballot found for leader2008.
>> Hope this helps, Debian
>> Project secretary (email@example.com)
> Not really. No.
> Especially when the instructions for requesting a ballot are
> frustrating incomplete and this was processed after the the cut-off.
Since the ballot has been delivered to d-d-a thrice in the
voting period, the asking for the ballot by mail option is rarely
> Who knew that attempting to engage an automated system from 21:54 GMT
> onwards in order to receive a ballot and then vote could be so
The vote has been going on for two weeks. Reminder are sent
weekly, and a special reminder was sent 48 hours ago begging
people not to wait until the eleventh hour. I suppose I should have
asked people not to wait until the tenth hour or thereabout too.
If you think the vote period is too short, then I suppose there
is the option to see if other
people consider it so too, and see if you can redo some of the
constitutional amendment that was passed by acclaim last year.
> Oh well.
Right. I thought so.
QOTD: "Everything I am today I owe to people, whom it is now to late to
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C