Re: Constitutional amendment: reduce the length of DPL election process
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> While we're at it, I've long felt that a one-year DPL term is just too
> short (because a DPL needs to spend a few months to get worked in, and
> can't do all that much when the next election is about to turn up for
> fear of being accused to be campaigning, often leaving only slightly
> over half a year or so of time for real work to be done). If more people
> feel like it, I'll draft up an amendment that turns it into a two-year
> term, or so.
Please formulate a GR and I'll second it immediately. 18-24 months seems
sensible, annual elections are a waste of everyone's time.