[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [GR] DD should be allowed to perform binary-only uploads



On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:02:51AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> Neil McGovern <neilm@debian.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:58:46AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > What says SPI only listens to the DPL, not the project?  AIUI, the DPL
> > > is appointed as an adviser to SPI's board, not a veto.
> > 
> > Further down the resolution, which you snipped:
> > ---- snip ----
> > Following informal discussions of Associated Project status with members
> > of the community, if satisfied the SPI Board will pass a resolution
> > inviting the project to become Associated with SPI.
> > 
> > This resolution will state the SPI Board's current understanding of who
> > is authorised to act for the project; it will invite the project to join
> > with SPI according to this Framework; and it will state a date at which
> > the invitation will lapse if not accepted.
> > ---- snip ----
> 
> Yes, but sorry if this question was unclear: What says SPI only listens to
> the DPL, not the project?
> 

I'll extract the exact line from the above text for you:
... state the SPI Board's current understanding of who is authorised to
    act for the project ...

In this case, the DPL.

> For example, what is the relevance of the above copy-pasted block?
> Does debian's invitation state that only the DPL is authorised to act,
> or is the Secretary authorised to act by sending other decisions to SPI,
> or is this an undefined thing that the spi-board are showing public
> unity about, or something else?
> 
> If only the DPL is authorised to act in SPI's eyes, is that SPI interfering
> in the decision-making of the project?  (by ignoring most of the processes)
> 
> In case anyone hasn't noticed, it seems very difficult to get anything
> like a straight answer out of most of the current SPI board lately.  Try
> it for yourself.  Fun for all the debian family.  Knock one over, win a
> coconut and five tons of flax!
> 

Prehaps you should ask SPI, rather than debian-vote.

Neil
-- 
< weasel> dpkg: shut up
< dpkg> No, I won't, and you can't make me. :P
< weasel> hah.  _I_ can

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: