Martin Wuertele <maxx@debian.org> wrote: Hi, I hereby second the proposal quoted below. > I disagree with the Policy delegation decision of our DPL [1] and > therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the Debian > constitution to delay the decision of the Debian Project Leader keeping > the Package Policy Committee as defined[2] in place until the Debian > Project Leader has found at least three people "who'll be active in > maintaining policy according to the policy process"[3] and delegates > them. Consequently the REJECT for uploads of debian-policy must be > removed. > > My reason for this proposal is the impression the revocation of the > delegation is based on the disagreement of the interpretation of the > policy between the chair of the Package Policy Committee and the Debian > Project Leader. > > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/10/msg00233.html > [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00017.html > [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/10/msg00238.html JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <jblache@debian.org> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169
Attachment:
pgprxKsHds1W3.pgp
Description: PGP signature