This one time, at band camp, Denis Barbier said: > Again, the question is: is this organisation sufficiently "outside" > of Debian when the DPL is intimately involved. In my opinion, the > answer is obviously no, meaning that this quarantine will not work > and as a result may badly harm the project. By recalling the > Project Leader, we ensure that there is no confusion between both > projects, give the Dunc project a better chance of success, and > preserve Debian in case of failure. So, just to be clear, you want to punish a Debian developer for their activities outside of Debian? That sounds like a really good thing to start doing. Can I be in charge of wiretaps in your brave new world? I'm glad you're looking out for the good of Debian here. Because, just for a moment, this really looked like a good way to create a lot of divisiveness and make things much harder than they already are. But who knows, maybe we'll be better off with DPL's that never try anything new. Certainly a new idea is a punishable offense in most companies I've seen. So now that we're in crazy-as-batshit land, who do you want to bring up on charges next? I suggest an inquisition. Nobody ever expects that. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sgran@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature