On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:44:19PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 08:10:05PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Seconded. > > I am shocked at the support that this is seeing, and I wonder if people > are letting their feelings about this particular project cloud their > judgement about recalling a DPL? > > Remember what we are saying here -- that because some Australian > publication got some facts wrong, that we need to recall the DPL. > > Why is there any support at all for this? > > Publications have been getting things wrong about Debian for years. We > should correct them, not shoot the person they wrote about. Let me quote Anthony Towns again: A question that has been raised is whether the organisation can be sufficiently "outside" of Debian when the DPL is intimately involved. I don't have the answer to that - in my opinion it can be, but whether this one is will be up to Debian to decide. This vote is in my opinion the best way to answer this question. Denis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature