Re: Amendment: special exception for firmware because of technical limitations
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:12:56PM +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> writes:
> > Given the latest mail from Anthony Towns ("Firmware & Social Contract:
> > GR proposal"), it looks like I was correct. He just try to stop this
> > GR by proposing his own one.
>
> The DPL has the same right as the other developers to propose GR's
> that he feels are the correct ones. I fail to see why this would be
> bad, but if you think that a DPL should not have that power (during
> his/her term), feel free to suggest a GR to change the Constitution :)
What is bad is not that Anthony proposed a GR, but that he misinterpreted the
poll's result has Aurelien had predicted back then.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: