On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:38:22AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote: > [+2 questions from other people] > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 04:39:52PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > Why does it need to happen directly after r2? > [+3 questions] > > Uh, what the hell? > [+2 things that might be answers] > > This is why I hate trying to talk about things on Debian lists, for > > reference. > Do you think list talks might go more smoothly if you seemed not > to take questions so personally and made clear what answers what? All the questions seemed designed to be taken personally to me. I'm not sure why > > The reason to do it now is to reduce the potential for delays in future. is insufficient answer to the question you cite. > Do you think answering "uh, what the hell?" is "being > courteous to each other on mailing lists"? (from > http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/platforms/ajt ) I don't see any problem with it, no -- it's not an attack on anyone, it's just a (strong) expression of bewilderment... I presume you think otherwise? Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature