Re: Second call for votes for the GFDL position statement

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Second call for votes for the GFDL position statement
From: NOKUBI Takatsugu <knok@daionet.gr.jp>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 16:54:42 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 871wxen0zh.wl%knok@daionet.gr.jp>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87r75hvy9z.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com>
References: <[🔎] 87r75hvy9z.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com>

-=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
25a628e9-d88e-40b7-8e1c-888cff421ea5
[ 4 ] Choice 1: GFDL-licensed works are unsuitable for main in all cases
[ 1 ] Choice 2: GFDL-licensed works without unmodifiable sections are free
[ 3 ] Choice 3: GFDL-licensed works are compatible with the DFSG [needs 3:1]
[ 2 ] Choice 4: Further discussion
-=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Attachment: pgplPhnwoa208.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Second call for votes for the GFDL position statement
  - From: Debian Project Secretary <secretary@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Question for Bill Allombert: independence
Next by Date: Re: Question to all candidates about stable point releases
Previous by thread: Second call for votes for the GFDL position statement
Next by thread: Re: Second call for votes for the GFDL position statement
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread