On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:25:49AM +0100, Jutta Wrage wrote:
In all other plattforms there are only minor validation problems that can be corrected easily without making a noticible difference. But as far as I can see, none of the pages really was valid HTML strict and none (or nearly none) uses semantic tags only, which would be better for people who can "see" only the text content.
My platform was run through the HTML "tidy" program with the -asxml option. No warnings, errors, or complaints were output by the program, which declared it fully "XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" compliant. Ted --It's not true unless it makes you laugh, but you don't understand it until it makes you weep.
Eukleia: Ted Walther Address: 5690 Pioneer Ave, Burnaby, BC V5H2X6 (Canada) Contact: 604-430-4973
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature