Question for all candidates about their Plattform pages
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Maybe, it is not right, asking here as I am not a DD at all, but I
wonder about the web presentation of candidates.
1. One of the candidates uses pictures to illustrate his platform,
but does not give an alternative description for lynx users and blind
people - accident?
2. One of the candidates uses font tag (which is not valid HTML
strict) and makes text not visible in graphical browsers due to the
not noticible difference to the background. The hidden text is shown
in lynx. - accident?
In all other plattforms there are only minor validation problems that
can be corrected easily without making a noticible difference. But as
far as I can see, none of the pages really was valid HTML strict and
none (or nearly none) uses semantic tags only, which would be better
for people who can "see" only the text content.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----