Re: Anton's amendment
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 18:23:43 -0700, Wesley J Landaker <email@example.com> said:
> Manoj, I really don't see how you can believe that this proposal is
> "novel and unconventional", but if you really, *honestly* believe
> that, and you are not pushing a 3:1 because of your personal views
> about the GFDL, I guess I understand your position.
> Anyway, I don't think I agree with your take on this proposal, but I
> do agree that you should do your job as secretary as honestly as and
> objectively as possible. If you are truely doing that then I support
> you even if I think you are wrong. =)
My personal beliefs do not have any bearing on actions I takew
with my secretaries hat on, to the best of my ability to do so.
I do believe that "The license must allof for modifications"
does mean that any modification of the work must be
permissible -- not just modifying whatever the author gives you
permission to modify.
(Extreme exampls: You can not modify this work, apart from the
last period. You can modify that to whatever you want -- does not
meet the DFSG, even though it allows you to modify the last byte of
Each person has the right to take the subway.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C