Re: Anton's amendment
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 10:41:55AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > I understand that this is how you interpret DFSG. (BTW, the list in
> > the brackets is not empty.)
> I think that is what is written, and is not just an interpretation.
Not everybody reads the text as you so it is just an interpretation.
> If you wish to extend the list of exceptions, that is fine. But that
> does mean the DFSG must be clarified to add to the list.
I don't belive it is reasonable to create exhaustive list of
exceptions. I prefer the second interpretation of DFSG3.
> When someone says "The license must permit modifications",
> there are no restrictions placed on the mods by the license.
1. Even GPL places restrictions on the modifications (look at
2. If some license says "you are allowed to change the word "foo"
to "bar" or "baz" then this license permits at least two