Re: DFSG, GFDL, and position statementsd
Le dimanche 22 janvier 2006 à 13:13 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> A) The delegates decision that the GFDL licensed works are non-free is
> wrong, the GFDL meets the DFSG. Override the delegated decision,
> and issue the following statement "..."
> B) The delegates decision that the GFDL licensed works are non-free
> does not hold for works without invariant sections, modify the
> delegated decision to allow works with no invariant sections in
> main, and issue the following statement "..."
I fail to see why these positions don't require 3:1 supermajority. As
currently, no sane interpretation of the DFSG can lead to such
statements, especially for A), we would have to modify the DFSG to fit
the requirement.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\
: :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org
`. `' joss@debian.org
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Reply to: