[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Branden's time commitments (was: Re: followup to my time-management question)



On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 10:27:02PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org> writes:
> > I think it's pretty obvious that Debian should switch.  Something about
> > support for a hojillion newer cards that is not in XFree86,
> > Composite/Damage/Fixes (not in XFree86), supported by all other major
> > vendors, et al.  But nevermind that.  Can you make a case for sticking
> > with XFree86?  If you can, please do so.
> 
> Seems pretty clear to me, actually, that the xfree86 packages should
> be based on xfree86.

Sure, but what should Debian's canonical X implementation be?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: