also sprach Steve Langasek <email@example.com> [2005.03.07.2359 +0100]: > Andreas and Branden are free to consult with me whenever they want > a second opinion about a question they've been asked, just as they > would be able to consult the "DPL team" if elected; for that > matter, other DPL candidates are also free to consult me if they > want my opinion. Would only members of the DPL team be able to consult you for your opinion? Or, to take this further: so far, project scud has been two things for me: a good idea, and a big surprise. It replaces a cathedral with a bazaar, but it was a secret for two or more months before it hit the news. Since I believe your answer to my initial question to be 'no', I wonder why we need a team at all. Why can't the DPL simply immerse in the developer community and consult with individual developers, or all of us, depending on the challenge at hand? He could call out to you for release questions, Jeroen for QA, Bdale for business stuff, or anyone else when appropriate. Why the need for a closed council, which will surely employ closed means of communication among its members? Why not consult in public so we all know how our project is actually being led? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: Digital signature