Re: Vote Robinson for DPL!
Ean Schuessler wrote:
> On Saturday 19 February 2005 02:30 pm, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Branden's implication on IRC was that he had already paid it when he
> > got the note from your mother, and that you had already said Huzzah!
> > when your mother sent the reminder, suggesting that you and she don't
> > communicate very well about business.
> A strained suggestion at best. A promise from SPI to pay is not the same as a
> check in hand. My Mom doesn't read spi-private. Worst case scenerio, I did
> not run into my Mom's office and shout "they paid!" the second I read
> Branden's post.
> It mostly indicates that Branden did not copy my Mother on his message
> announcing payment. Otherwise, why would he write her?
> In any case, my beef is that he is publicly talking about the incompetence of
> my organization for totally unsubstantiated reasons. That's bad behavior.
Ironically, he did so in a relatively small forum without public archive (iirc)
but you brought the issue up yourself on a mailing list, with > 400 people
subscribe and a public archive that will end up on Google.
So, if you only want to document bad behaviour in connection to Brainfood,
you did well, Google will catch up on this.
If you just wanted to get the issues "straight" you seem to have failed
and created an interesting connection on search engines.
See, there are reasons private mailing lists exist, and they don't
violate the DFSG.
> Even more so since my organization is a long-time, reliable and well behaved
> donor and supporter of the Debian project. If this is how Branden treats
> friends I'd hate to see how he treats enemies.
*sigh* And you've got this documented publically. Well done...
Life is a lot easier when you have someone to share it with. -- Sean Perry