Re: GR status
MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com> writes:
> On 2004-02-26 06:36:57 +0000 Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I did get that from the web page. Coomon sense seems to
>> indicate that we can either cease active support of the non-free
>> section (editing the SC as needed), or we can reaffirm our commitment
>> to non-free and continue to provide it.
>
> Modifying the amendment to delete part or all of the original proposal
> does not seem to be one of the Secretary's powers, or do you consider
> wording just a matter of procedure? If the amendment wishes to delete
> things, *it should say so*, as previous amendments have.
Well, the secretary can use his mind to not do something that is
not meaningful.
>
>>> As it does to me. That is why I think it useless, too.
>> I fail to see how you could arrive at that illogical
>> conclusion, but hey.
>
> It delays the vote in order to add a second "status quo" option to the
> ballot.
Not sure it delays the vote, and I, as several others, want to clearly
state that we want to continue our support of the non-free archive, GR
are made for this.
--
Rémi Vanicat
Reply to: