Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 07:38:11PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 01:33:28PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> > Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr> wrote:
> > > ---------------------
> > >
> > > We, Debian developers, issue the statement:
> > >
> > > "On the question on what software should be allowed in the main section
> > > of our archive (The official Debian distribution) for our forthcoming
> > > release code-named Sarge, we resolve that we will apply the same criterion
> > > as for our preceding release, code-named Woody."
> > >
> > > ---------------------
> >
> > Was the GFDL used in woody at all?
>
> Regardless, I think the statement should use more definite language than
> "the same criterion as for our preceding release." Does anyone have any
> good ideas?
How about:
We, Debian developers, issue the statement:
"On the question on what software should be allowed in the main section
of our archive (The official Debian distribution) for our forthcoming
release code-named Sarge, we resolve that all programs must meet the
DFSG, and all software must be legally distributable."
--
gram
Reply to: