Re: "keep non-free" proposal

[Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>]

On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:29:34PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:36:52PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > > See, there you go again. It's not part of the Debian distribution;
> > > > but it's certainly part of the Debian project. Saying categorically and
> > > > without clarification that non-free isn't part of "Debian" is exactly
> > > > as bad as saying it is part of "Debian".
> > > But the Social Contract says it's not part of Debian.  Right there, in
> > > those words.  
> > 
> > Yes, and then it clarifies precisely what it means when it says "Debian"
> > -- "the Debian GNU/Linux Distribution". Right there. In those words.
> 
> Actually no, paragraph five doesn't say that.  

But paragraph 1 does it.

Friendly,

Sven Luther