Re: Why Anthony Towns is wrong
Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
>
>> While I'm happy to talk about whether non-free should be kept or not,
>> I'm not interested in having a debate focussed on whether I'm personally
>> wrong or right.
>
> Except that part of the problem is your personal decision to rescind
> the current compromise in the social contract. You said not too long
> ago on this very list that it's silly and pedantic to insist that
> non-free is not part of Debian. Since that's the other half of the
> compromise, you seem to think it's over.
Anthony also said that it's more important to have documentation in Debian
for important programs, under whatever license, than that the documenation
be DFSG-free. I suppose this is consistent with his curious views about
non-free being part of Debian. Yet he claimed to support the Social
Contract.... at least I think he did.
--
Nathanael Nerode <neroden at gcc.gnu.org>
US citizens: if you're considering voting for Bush, look at these first:
http://www.misleader.org/ http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/arar/
http://www.house.gov/reform/min/politicsandscience/
Reply to: