Re: "keep non-free" proposal
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:07:33AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-03-09 06:07:36 +0000 Sven Luther <email@example.com>
> >I would gladly have seen a ballot of the like of :
> > A) drop non-free, do not create non-free.org, stop any relationship
> > with non-free related .debs.
> > B) drop non-free and create non-free.org
> Would a GR that tried to compel actions by other groups be valid? Is
> this GR trying to commit the project to producing non-free.org?
Well, this is the actual drop non-free option, the A) would carry more
restrictions, but this one is naturally, dependent on someone creating
non-free.org to move stuff too.
> > C) keep non-free, but take a more active hand in examining and
> > removing stuff from non-free. [snip!]
> Too vague. I tried to discuss this sort of option with you in January,
> but you weren't really willing (see my email in a few seconds). I'm
> sorry that no-one thought it important enough to form into something
> on this ballot for you, but you could have done that too.
Yeah, it's Raul's fault :)) (no offense meant, raul).