Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 01:00, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-03-08 13:27:55 +0000 Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
> wrote:
> > And seriously, but does a "we should stay
> > polite to RMS" strike you as a serious argument you can bring to
> > upstream when discussing this issue.
>
> There was a lot more detail beyond that, but you seem to have become
> obsessed by that one element.
Hmm, seems I was mistaken about sven being a bot.
Reply to: