Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
On 2004-03-08 13:15:02 +0000 Hamish Moffatt <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 12:59:55PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
Really? Do you like low quality packages? Do you think the equivalent
I want a proliferation of third-party free packages for debian.
rpmfind.net (hurl!) would be an asset to Debian users?
There's no causal link between rpmfind.net and poor packaging. I hope
the Debian community can respond to the challenge by supporting QA
programmes, rather than its current ostrich approach of pretending
there is no packages but Debian. Even things like the Bugs package
header are a step ahead of rpm, aren't they?
You can probably tell that I don't, and that's a big part of why
I don't want non-free removed from ftp.debian.org yet.
Third party packages already exist, regardless of the GR.
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ email@example.com
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/