Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:28:15PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > It also doesn't say anything about whether they need non-free to be
> > hosted by debian. The relative popularity of the non-debian-hosted
> > java packages suggests not.
> Sure, but please tell me, if we are going to move non-free stuff to
> non-free.org, exactly how will that change anything over the current
> situation in regard with packages with problematic licences ?
Additional developers, such as myself, would be willing to work
on non-free packages, *provided that they are outside of Debian*.