Re: Proposal: Call 'amendments' 'alternatives'
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:54:53 +0000, MJ Ray <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> Anyway, will you tell us what your interpretation is, for the
> abstract general case? Roughly what is the range of valid forms a
> caller could use?
Related issues should be on the same ballot, orthogonal issues
should be separated, and exercise common sense?
VMS version 2.0 ==>
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C