Re: Re: "keep non-free" proposal
Anthony Towns wrote:
>Basically, there are two paths to having a main that's completely free:
>remove everything that's not free, and have an operating system that's
>even more flakey (byebye to the Debian logo, byebye to glibc and gcc
>documentation, byebye to RFCs, byebye to apps without clearly DFSG-free
>data, byebye to everything licensed under the GPL potentially); or you can
>accept that there's no real need to do this immediately, and work with
>upstream to ensure that stuff is licensed as freely as possible.
Perhaps you haven't noticed that in the case of the FSF, upstream is actively
hostile to relicensing documentation on DFSG-free terms?
Reply to: