Re: A transition plan to fsf-linux.org
On 2004-01-22 09:09:30 +0000 John Lines <firstname.lastname@example.org>
re-badge it as fsf-linux.
This seems an obvious faux pas, given FSF's view that the OS should be
GNU/Linux, as Debian currently calls it. Missing from this transition
plan are any proposals to address namespaces, Origin and Bugs, amongst
others. There may be cases where debian regards software as free while
FSF does not, because of our different ways of evaluating licences,
although I cannot think of any current examples.
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ email@example.com
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/