Re: Call for votes for the Condorcet/Clone proof SSD voting methods GR
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 20:30:33 -0700, John H Robinson, IV <jaqque@debian.org> said:
> case in point: as we add more voters that actively vote _against_ a
> proposal, we can cause an option to ``fail to meet quorum.'' that
> goes against every applicable definition of quorum that i can come
> across.
Can you demonstrate that with an example, please? As far as I
can tell, this is very wrong, or at best shows a
misunderstanding of the proposal.
manoj
--
"There... I've run rings 'round you logically" Monty Python's Flying
Circus
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: