Re: Splitting Aye/Nay from vote tallying (Was: Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying)
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 01:44 AM, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
for the ``quorum'' requirement: this is easy.
require X number of seconds with each anti-second counting against the
totally number of seconds.
So, in other words, drop Condorcet and switch to a simple majority vote
instead. You've got votes for (seconds) and votes against
(anti-seconds). How is this not a vote?
Requiring Q seconds would be much more reasonable, methinks.
this takes out all possibilities of strategic voting, and applies the
strategy to the proposal stage. at least the vote tallying method
remains untainted :/
Yeah, but it got ten times worse overall.
Reply to: