Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting

[Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>]

On Nov 1, 2003, at 23:49, Manoj Srivastava wrote:

> > No. It can cause C to win by removing A and B from the running for
> > no good reason. That's the problem.
>
> 	Only if such ballots are deemed proper procedure.

A.3.1 seems to say they are:

	Each resolution and its related amendments is voted on in a
	single ballot that includes an option for the original
	resolution, each amendment, and the default option (where
	applicable).

I guess it depends on how "related" is interpreted. At best, it could 
rule out non-germane amendments, but I don't see how it could rule out 
orthogonal ones.