Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 03:13:40 -0500, Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> said:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 10:01:53PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Ah yes. The usual jump to conclusions about the motivations of the
>> people you are debating with, hoping they shall stop talking. Way
>> to go.
> I'm confused; you've been doing it so comprehensively in your
> replies to my messages that I thought it was an accepted practice.
I believe you; I even believe you have long considered it so.
manoj
--
Suaviter in modo, fortiter in re. Se non e vero, e ben trovato.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>