Re: High Rate of ballot rejections this year
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> It was suggested that I also post the mailers that were used
> in successfully sending a ballot to the voting engine, and here are
> the results. I am attaching both the list of good mailers, as well
> as the reasons for rejection of the ballot, with the MUA and count.
> I note that there were tweo succesful votes from people who
> use Outlook (and no rejections).
> Mutt still impresses.
Speaking about Emacsen mailers, there are not enough details because
Emacsen usually use external packages (gpg.el, mailcrypt) to perform
encryption and signing.
You wouldn't conclude that Gnus/Mew/whatever do not it right sometimes,
it wouldn't make sense.