Hi, Branden Robinson: > I think Anthony may be trying to leave that to the discretion of the > person preparing the ballot (the Project Secretary). > If so, I disagree with that. I think we should mandate that ballots > must permit appication of the same rank to multiple options. > I agree. > > > "RATIONALE": Voters should rank the options they prefer in the > > > order that they prefer them, ranking the default option higher > > > than any options they believe are unacceptable. If they believe > > > the current situation is superior to any of the proposed changes, > > > they should propose or second an amendment that simply preserves > > > the status-quo, and only rank options they find unacceptable below > > > the default option. > > > > > s/amendment/option/ ? > > No, voters propose General Resolutions and amendments thereto, not > ballot options per se. It doesn't make much sense to add an amendment which states that nothing changes, i.e. that there's no amendment. ;-) -- Matthias Urlichs | noris network AG | http://smurf.noris.de/
Attachment:
pgpNCbe53NaXR.pgp
Description: PGP signature