Re: RFD: Reviving Constitutional amendment: Smith/Condorcet vote tallying
>>>>> "Branden" == Branden Robinson <email@example.com> writes:
Branden> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:29:31AM +1000, Anthony Towns
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:00:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 03:13:04AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> > > OTOH, so far none of this has mattered: > "Past performance
>> is no guarantee of future results."
>> Sure, I figured most people would draw the same conclusions
>> themselves, given the data.
Branden> I see no evidence that people's opinions are leaning one
Branden> way or the other, yet.
O, you want me toos? Seems like fixing the issue is worth the effort
and seems like voting on the recommendations is worth doing.
I followed the discussion and didn't really see anything that required
comments; the summaries were fairly good.