Re: well?
Sven LUTHER <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 08:25:42AM +1300, Michael Beattie wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 01:14:55PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 05:26:44PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Are we all now clear on why ballots must be understandable, and why
> > > > transparency of process is important?
> > >
> > > Should we vote on the wording of the ballot before each vote ?
> >
> > No, because we need to vote on if we should vote in the wording of the vote
> > first.
>
> A complete paralysis of the debian decision making process, nice, no ?
Debian has more been about playing Nomic lately
( http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/nomic.htm ) than about putting up a
linux distribution...
Sigh...
Phil.
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: well?
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: well?
- From: Peter Makholm <peter@makholm.net>
- References:
- well?
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: well?
- From: Sven LUTHER <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
- Re: well?
- From: Michael Beattie <mjb@debian.org>
- Re: well?
- From: Sven LUTHER <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>