Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Alternate disambiguation of 4.1.5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi,
By my count, that makes six seconds to my proposal so
far. This exceeds the requirement set forth in the constitution,
which only requires 5 other developers.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
4.2.1. The Developers follow the Standard Resolution Procedure, below. A
resolution or amendment is introduced if proposed by any Developer
and sponsored by at least K other Developers, or if proposed by
the Project Leader or the Technical Committee.
4.2.7. Q is half of the square root of the number of current Developers.
K is Q or 5, whichever is the smaller. Q and K need not be
integers and are not rounded.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
I note that the seconds to the proposal are the following:
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>
Christian Surchi <csurchi@debian.org>
Taketoshi Sano <sano@debian.org>
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>
manoj
ps: I even verified that all of us are developers using the command
gpg --no-options --no-default-keyring --keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.pgp --keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg --list-public-keys
using a current debian-keyrings package
- --
Experience is that marvelous thing that enables you recognize a
mistake when you make it again. Franklin P. Jones
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>
iD8DBQE54z2tIbrau78kQkwRARkuAJ9Y4OnJ5y01EPkzLPRICVELbyVBAwCcDRBa
CkV+hARONf4BId62JDxSLTs=
=jLsf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: