[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: account used for meeting request replies in evolution?



On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 10:10 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 10:08 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 23:08 +0100, Steven Post wrote:
> > > Is there a way to configure evolution to select the correct address when
> > > accepting meeting requests or should I file a bug report with the Gnome
> > > developers?
> > 
> > You want to report a bug for Evolution 3.4.4-2? For those old versions I
> > don't had any issues, but I didn't test what you are doing,

I could test any solution in a VM running Arch (running a more
up-to-date version of evolution), but I would like to see it solved on
my desktop and laptop. If it is possible at all, because I don't see a
way to do this.

>  however,
> > I've got several accounts too and for those old versions a reply did use
> > the address of the account an email was sent to, but the 3.6. versions
> > are all buggy as hell, e,g. those replies aren't sent to the correct
>                                                         ^^ from
> > address anymore.

The problem is not replies, but only meeting requests.

>  The only reason for me to stay with Evolution is, that
> > I want to continue sharing the mail folders from different *NIX installs
> > on the same computer, without the need to have an imap server and to
> > lose old emails, IOW only evolution is able to read evolution mails, if
> > other MUAs try to use the same maildirs it doesn't work.

Better keep an eye open for different versions of Evolution on those
installations. If I recall correctly, they changed the mailbox format
somewhere. In my case, the IMAP server is actually a big plus, it
enables me to have my mail available anywhere using a web interface, and
plays nice with multiple machines (desktop and laptop for example).

> > 
> > If possible switch to another MUA. Distro specific bugs are usually
> > ignored by the distro maintainers and I suspect bugs caused by upstream
> > will be ignored by upstream.
> > 
I think that should be the other way around, right?
In any case, apart from this, I actually quite like evolution, I'm
accessing the same mail from different machines, the common protocol
being IMAP (and Google Calendar). Not from the same machine as in your
case, where I see that could be a problem.

I tried using Thunderbird before (a couple of years ago), but that
didn't really work well on my setup, both technically (although that
might have improved these days) and I didn't like the look and feel of
it.
Best case for me would be having my evolution issue solved, not
switching to another MUA. Personally I doubt that many (if any) got this
particular corner case just right.

Regards,
Steven

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: