[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gpg/pgp noise



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/05/12 12:57, Indulekha wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:53:30PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote: 
> 08.05.2012 14:45, Jochen Spieker kirjoitti:
>>>> Indulekha:
>>>>> 
>>>>> No, I think you may have an incorrect or incomplete 
>>>>> configuration....
>>>> 
>>>> This is inline vs. MIME:
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.phildev.net/pgp/pgp_clear_vs_mime.html
>>>> 
>>>> J.
> 
> And that page forgets the problems in MIME.
> 
> PGP/MIME requires headers, message and the signature.asc to be 
> verified. Some mailing list programs mess up with the headers and
> this way make PGP/MIME signatures unverifiable.
> 
> In INLINE, the signature is in message and it doesn't require
> headers to be verified so it's harder to be messed up by mailing
> list software.
> 
>> 
> 
> Well, all I know is that Jochen Spieker is able to use it without 
> being intrusive.... Maybe you should try to follow his example? :)


I'm getting the distinct impression you're not quite following this
thread as it's written :-)

Cheers,

  Phil...

- -- 
currently (ab)using
Debian Squeeze, Fedora Verne, OS X Snow Leopard, Ubuntu Oneiric


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPqQraAAoJECPmYW6gk8JjOqgIAJqKhX1T4P3PCW2izeegD6E6
BZaodWrF7F4ArXnYylGOJUCOeFLxvcEWIQuiNjZ6F6SI7Ucc9Q0e2xESUTcycInh
JjHqJaw0RWt9zbPHJBASj0t9dNBKBkCJcji9QY3cJBb9k+HJCo9NrWbBGOfWN5aO
48FnTjM+ThCUho3Cu/ZHFIZq6o+ktTZNjENoj4ePMvakI1OlA1WWCXJBOnUcaWMP
kxUJFy993YGuXGf4u0/ydt0ZdngRKVYV8VaDfJ4eSwUVtlbzHxa98mxTcytlORLf
MmCxO7oQ0njnvCIJdSGRJopRhCB4vx8+EcO9P5fRekf1JiLm6ipF/D1WiZEcZ9s=
=ZfKC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: