[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gpg/pgp noise



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/05/12 12:29, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> 08.05.2012 14:20, Lisi kirjoitti:
>> On Tuesday 08 May 2012 12:11:56 Indulekha wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
>> Increasing the pool of servers that gpg checks may alleviate your
>>  problem but it's more than likely to be people haven't exported 
>> their key.
> 
>> Mine has been exported. See how you view that one.
> 
>> Cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks, Phil. After adding the keyserver Mika suggested, I
>>>> no longer see the error messages but do still have to see
>>>> this messy block of text
>>>> 
>>>> at the end:
> 
>> But did you after Phil's?
> 
>> Lisi
> 
> 
> 
> That signature block informs to be bad signature from Phil.
> 
>> Viestin sisennettyä osaa (vastausta) on luultavasti muokattu
> (In English: The indented part of message (reply) has been
> possibly changed)
>> gpg -komento ja -tuloste:
> In English: gpg -command and -output:
>> /usr/bin/gpg2 gpg: Signature made ti  8. toukokuuta 2012
>> 13.53.22 EEST using RSA
> key ID A093C263
>> gpg: BAD signature from "Phil Dobbin <bukowskiscat@gmail.com>"

That's because the email client didn't snip the quoted previous
message correctly therefore part of the original signature was still
included.

Cheers,

  Phil...

- -- 
currently (ab)using
Debian Squeeze, Fedora Verne, OS X Snow Leopard, Ubuntu Oneiric


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPqQSqAAoJECPmYW6gk8JjgoAIAJrz/H6d02x4pe6YaeHZ7Eh9
66bxQhuOvvGzvYZ4hTmgeK5KNLEjO0ldlArVbtbEX5VQflPZXGMg394X5jAU6Lgr
yOShLd1VSJH7bwPKq2AudOEO9CutGgu1JOWNAsUo96q1aRnqhYH8cuerpsMSWTaa
DZX+GEpHgVbCd69jS3f++lZ+95oop7SmbS9qhDyfKd8E/DTWEIP+Va7OFRAVAeKu
TFHAuNM2Vn9WheZ4XYkHLDLVXhVnFgk8FBCpxmeta4Gm8FUkWiGnFxHcYpP7onCk
lCJRv9I5DRZY/3e9RsEiAzJD+CDbIgOgP5NsPxPONYHgf/Ei5+WD4yCN9wr6Z8E=
=6CrI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: