Re: Using wheezy or testing in sources.list for security updates
On 2012-01-29 11:51 +0100, Colin wrote:
> After reading the security support on testing, I was thinking if I
> would use wheezy at the moment on my sources.list instead of testing,
> then I would all have the "updates" from testing plus the security
No. Also, wheezy and testing are currently _identical_.
> Or should I just use 'deb http://security.debian.org testing/updates
> main contrib non-free' ?
This depends on what you intend to do when wheezy becomes stable. Do
you want to continue to use testing forever, or do you want to have a
system that remains basically unchanged for a long time? If the latter,
use "wheezy" instead of "testing".