Re: Does IPv6 preclude use of a NAT gateway?
On 12/07/11 22:59, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 08:57:10PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> Well, I found it in https://www.sixxs.net/forum/?msg=setup-3668841:
>> I suggest you read the material you quote.... see the last comment?
>
> Well, the last comment is quite new. When I read the thread the first
> time, this comment was not challenged. Five months have passed.
I'm pretty cynical about forum posts, and Wikipedia, if it was Slashdot
I'd believe the opposite - the more posters that said it was true the
more certain I'd be that it's not. ;-) 16 million idiots believing a
stupid thing etc
I trust the standards bodies to publish headache inducing reading, and I
don't trust corporations to respect standards - just another reason I
like GNU.
>
>> Note also the comment/query about Microsoft's IPv6 stack - which *does*
>> include IPSec (so does the GNU-Linux stack, which is better documented).
>
> Well, I didn’t say that there is no IPSec for IPv6, only that IPSec is
> not mandatory anymore.
>
> That was wrong, as I know now. At least in theory. Thanks for the link.
>
> Shade and sweet water!
>
> Stephan
>
I'm still not convinced, either way. Guess I'll just have to do some
research ;-p
Cheers
--
What did moths bump into before the electric light bulb was invented?
Boy, the lightbulb really screwed the moth up didn't it? Are there moths
on their way to the sun now going, "It's gonna be worth it!"
~ Bill Hicks
Reply to: