Re: Does IPv6 preclude use of a NAT gateway?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Scott Ferguson
> <prettyfly.productions@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 12/07/11 12:22, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh, my. You can load the IP addresses *directly*, by IP address, and
>>> access them if you have a route to them.
>>
>> *If you have a route*.... in the examples given there is no route, hence
>> NAT.
>
> *Really*. Then I suggest you look up the output of your local "route
> -n" command on any internal network that uses both 192.168.0.0/24 and
> 10.0.0.0/8, or look up the output of the "traceroute" command.
10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16 are only *privately*
routable - and sometimes the "privately" is dropped...
Reply to: