On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:35:53 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 21 Jun 2011 at 10:51:34 +0000, Camaleón wrote:
>> I can understand that the package is provided with a monetary cost (but
>> still open source). What I fail to see is why the author does not want
>> it to be distributed by anyone :-?
> He has never said that. Quite the opposite:
> I repeat with precision "No. Do what you want". I promise I won't
> complain anymore about the fact imapsync is on Debian or not.
> >> As far as I can see, the author of this software has even said in a
> >> message in this bug report that "You can even make [this software]
> >> a GPL software", which I understand him to mean that the intent
> >> of the new license is to be GPL-compatible!
> > You are reading very selectively.
> Jeff is reading right.
> (The final sentence is Gilles Lamiral's).
Great, but I've also read this (which is the reason why the packages was
Maybe he didn't express it in the right way (!?), but now I'm afraid his
possition is not very clear...